Written By: MB Group
Transaction costs don’t always make headlines, but they can move the numbers in ways that matter. Buying a new asset, restructuring debt, or chasing a merger? The way you account for those costs, either capitalizing or expensing them, shapes your financials and, yes, your compliance story too.
In this blog, we’ll break down what counts as a transaction cost, when it belongs on the balance sheet versus the income statement, and why those decisions carry more weight than most businesses realize.
Table of Contents:
Before we get into the “capitalize or expense” conversation, let’s start with the basics: what exactly are transaction costs?
These are the direct, out-of-pocket costs tied to a major business move, like buying or selling an asset, raising capital, or closing an M&A deal. Think legal fees, banker commissions, inspections, advisory services, AKA the necessary friction that comes with getting deals done. |
Some common transaction cost examples include:
Getting these numbers right matters for several reasons:
In short, transaction cost accounting is a strategic component of financial reporting.
Transaction costs might not get much attention—but how you account for them can shift the way your business looks on paper. Whether you're buying assets, raising capital, or working through a deal, the key question is: capitalize the cost, or expense it?
This choice impacts your financial statements, tax treatment, and how profitable your business appears to the outside world.
In simple terms:
You should capitalize a transaction cost when it meets specific criteria:
Common examples of capitalized costs include:
These costs are seen as part of the total investment in the asset or transaction, not just short-term business expenses.
Costs should be expensed when they don't meet the capitalization criteria—typically when:
Common examples of expensed costs include:
These costs are treated as operating expenses, hitting the income statement in the period they’re incurred.
When it comes to transaction costs, the rules aren’t one-size-fits-all. Businesses need to follow the accounting framework that applies to them—and that framework shapes how those costs show up on the books.
While U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) overlap in some areas, they take different approaches to classification and treatment.
Understanding how each framework treats transaction costs is critical for accurate financial reporting—especially for companies operating globally or preparing for audits.
GAAP tends to offer more rule-based, detailed guidance depending on the type of transaction. Different types of costs fall under specific Accounting Standards Codifications (ASCs), each with its own treatment.
Here are a few common examples:
Overall, GAAP aims to align cost treatment with the nature and timing of the benefit the company receives, but it often spells out specific treatment for each case.
IFRS takes a principles-based approach. Instead of prescribing detailed rules, it emphasizes broader concepts like future economic benefit and direct attribution. The result? More room for judgment—and more need for consistency.
Here’s how IFRS typically treats transaction costs across key standards:
The way you treat transaction costs—whether you capitalize them or expense them—has a direct effect on how your financial health appears to internal stakeholders, external investors, and regulatory bodies. Even though the costs may be the same, the presentation of those costs can paint very different pictures.
Let’s break down how this plays out across key financial statements:
When transaction costs are capitalized, they don’t show up as an immediate expense. Instead, they’re added to the value of an associated asset or liability—effectively increasing that item’s book value.
These capitalized costs are then amortized or depreciated over the asset’s useful life or the term of the liability. That spreads the impact over multiple periods and avoids large single-period hits.
When costs are expensed, they’re recognized immediately as a reduction in income for the current reporting period.
While expensing provides a more immediate snapshot of current profitability, it can also obscure long-term investments if not contextualized properly.
Transaction costs also affect how cash movements are reported:
This distinction matters because it influences how a company’s operational efficiency and liquidity appear—especially when comparing performance over time or across peers.
When transaction costs are misclassified or overcapitalized, financial statements can paint a misleading picture, whether intentional or not. That’s why consistent application of accounting standards and clear, transparent disclosures aren’t just best practice—they’re expected. Auditors and regulators tend to zero in on inconsistencies or overly aggressive treatment, particularly during financial reviews, investor reporting, or M&A due diligence.
Transaction costs come with the territory when growing, expanding, or managing capital—but how you account for them can either strengthen financial clarity or chip away at it.
Here are a few tips to manage them wisely:
Set clear internal guidelines on which transaction cost examples should be capitalized versus expensed. Train your finance team to follow these procedures during every transaction.
Maintain detailed records that support the business purpose of each cost. This makes audits and compliance checks far easier.
Some capitalized costs may have favorable tax treatment when amortized over time. A coordinated approach between your CPA and your business ensures alignment.
After closing, evaluate the total transaction cost breakdown and confirm accounting treatment is consistent with standards and documentation.
Accounting standards evolve. Changes in how ASC or IFRS frameworks treat certain costs can impact reporting.
Whether you’re acquiring new assets, issuing bonds, or securing financing, transaction costs are part of doing business. But their accounting treatment—capitalized or expensed—can have long-lasting impacts on your financials.
By understanding transaction costs, applying the correct rules under GAAP or IFRS, and proactively managing them, your business can avoid costly mistakes and build stronger financial statements. If you’re unsure whether you’re handling your transaction costs correctly, MB Group is here to help you clarify, comply, and optimize.
Let’s talk about how to streamline your transaction cost accounting—reach out to MB Group today.
Frequently Asked Questions About Transaction Costs
Q: What are the three types of transaction costs in real markets?
The three main types are search and information costs, bargaining costs, and enforcement costs. These cover everything from finding the right party to negotiating terms and making sure agreements are followed.
Q: How are new fees for some transactions explained?
New fees often reflect added complexity, risk, or regulatory requirements. For example, a lender might charge extra for processing a non-standard loan or a legal team may bill more for a cross-border deal.
Q: What is an example of a transaction cost?
A common example is legal fees paid during a company acquisition. Other examples include broker commissions, underwriting fees, and due diligence expenses.
Q: Why are transaction costs important?
Transaction costs can impact the total cost of a deal, affect how profits are reported, and change how financial health is perceived. Properly accounting for them helps ensure accurate reporting and better business decisions.
Tags: Business Accounting
Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered the accounting world with undeniable force, offering possibilities for streamlining processes and enhancing financial decision-making. While it's important to...
Read MoreAt the core of every successful small business is a great product, hard work, and accurate bookkeeping. While it may not be the most glamorous aspect of entrepreneurship, proper bookkeeping is key to...
Read MoreIn an unpredictable market, where things can change overnight, businesses need more than rigid financial plans. Market swings, shifting customer demands, and unexpected events can quickly throw off...
Read More